it seems like for quite a few of the men camille interviewed the gendered dynamic allows men to be generous, to 'deserve' being generous or having generosity look like luxury or masculinity. unlike philanthropy there's a face to face component but unlike service/charity it doesn't take up so much time.
i had an experience very similar to Jackson's. a while back a friend came to me talking about how she had trouble paying for bills and such and i offered to pay them for her. it was also extraordinarily hot but we were already on and off again that way but this dynamic was really a turn on. i sure as hell wouldn't call myself a sugar daddy or anything like that, and it wasn't about power, but i enjoyed the feeling of being needed and wanted.
it seems like for quite a few of the men camille interviewed the gendered dynamic allows men to be generous, to 'deserve' being generous or having generosity look like luxury or masculinity. unlike philanthropy there's a face to face component but unlike service/charity it doesn't take up so much time.
i had an experience very similar to Jackson's. a while back a friend came to me talking about how she had trouble paying for bills and such and i offered to pay them for her. it was also extraordinarily hot but we were already on and off again that way but this dynamic was really a turn on. i sure as hell wouldn't call myself a sugar daddy or anything like that, and it wasn't about power, but i enjoyed the feeling of being needed and wanted.